Everybody likes St. Augustine, but not always for the same reasons. I don’t much care for Confessions, although I appreciate that Augustine enjoyed far more the subsequent guilt than the fruit he stole from his neighbor’s yard as a boy. And although he’s not a conventional thinker, he’s given to the kind of pronouncements that one could imagine appearing in school yard philosophy. (Is it more virtuous for the virgin to yield to rapacious marauders or to save her chastity by throwing herself in the lake? Answer: she should yield, but by no means should she enjoy herself.) And he clearly enjoys demolishing his opponents’ weak arguments while setting up not a few of his own.
But none of these is what draws me to the man. What I love about Augustine is that he’s a scholar who hates to study. He refuses to educate himself in Hebrew letters and gets by on poor Greek, barely apologizing as he issues grand pronouncements of exegesis (which are really fun to read, and should put today’s radio preachers and science fiction authors to shame for their relative poverty of ingenuity). He refuses to formalize his arguments, or even to remain consistent with his own pronouncements. He knows that his brain is simply bigger and better than everyone else’s and he swings it like a cudgel, taking all comers. And why not? The Almighty doesn’t dole out first-rate minds to second-rate men, does He?
It’s hard not to long for the days when the most excellent churchmen were also total bastards. Whence came the foolish belief that saints should make pleasant company?